As one who enjoys the scientific processes as much as a good mystery or psychological thriller, I am often tasked with proving myself wrong. However, after 40 years I have failed miserably to prove my assertions about time wrong.
I need your help (or anyone you can recruit) to explain to me (with reasoning they would publicly endorse) on why the following is not a proof that time cannot be something that warps, bends, or a place a creature could come from:
Bob Lazar has a creepy video where he proports to explain how the aliens traverse long distances. They “Distort or warp or bend” the fabric of spacetime, essentially putting spacetime in motion.
However, if we wanted to duscuss the rate ‘warps’ occur in ‘spacetime,’ we would be required to construct a new 5th dimension called “time” to articulate how warps in spacetime occure over time. Therefore, such warps cannot literally be in (or of) that which we call time. It is a direct logical contradiction.
If you can help me find someone who can explain why that is not proof, I will buy you dinner! Seriously! I’m desperate. I’m positive I just reduced everything Bob said to meaningless absurdity. Still, everyone tells me I’m insane for thinking I could even have proof, but nobody will explain why my proof is invalid.
I have many people who think academia is a criminal syndicate and that my proof is valid, but obviously, they’re crazy conspiracy theorists also. After 40 years of having my cognitive senses invalidated with no actual argument, I’m about to conclude that I might be correct and everyone else is wrong.
Please rescue me from that inevitable state of arrogance! If you can find a public voice who can invalid that proof, I will buy you a $100 gift card to your favorite restaurant.